ideas
Ideation & Ideas
Section titled “Ideation & Ideas”Raw ideas, future possibilities, and “what if” thoughts captured during development.
Format
Section titled “Format”### [IDEA-XXX] Title**Date**: YYYY-MM-DD**Status**: Captured / Exploring / Implementing / Parked**Description**: What's the idea?**Potential**: What could this enable?**Challenges**: What makes this hard?Active Ideas
Section titled “Active Ideas”[IDEA-001] CRDT Solves Both Web and SMB Conflicts
Section titled “[IDEA-001] CRDT Solves Both Web and SMB Conflicts”Date: 2024-12-19 Status: Implementing
Description: The same CRDT approach that enables web collaboration also solves SMB share conflicts. These are fundamentally the same problem - concurrent edits need merging, not overwriting.
Potential:
- Plugin-only mode for SMB users (no infrastructure needed)
- Dropbox/OneDrive/iCloud users get conflict-free sync
- Progressive adoption from individual to enterprise
Challenges:
- Sync latency depends on file sync speed (not real-time)
- Users need to install plugin on all clients
[IDEA-002] Presence Awareness with “Nudge”
Section titled “[IDEA-002] Presence Awareness with “Nudge””Date: 2024-12-19 Status: Implementing
Description: Show users when others are editing the same file, and suggest editing in a different section to avoid collisions.
Potential:
- Better UX when multiple users on same file
- Reduces unnecessary CRDT merges
- Educational - teaches users about collaboration
Challenges:
- Need to track cursor positions
- Nudge suggestions need to be helpful, not annoying
- File-only mode has delayed presence updates
[IDEA-003] Progressive Adoption Path
Section titled “[IDEA-003] Progressive Adoption Path”Date: 2024-12-19 Status: Implementing
Description: Design the system so users can start simple and add complexity as needed:
- File-only (just install plugin)
- Hybrid (add server for real-time)
- Full enterprise (VNC + SSO + audit)
Potential:
- Lower barrier to entry
- Users grow into enterprise features
- Same codebase serves all use cases
Challenges:
- Settings UI needs to be clear
- Documentation for each level
[IDEA-004] AFFiNE as Alternative
Section titled “[IDEA-004] AFFiNE as Alternative”Date: 2024-12-18 Status: Parked
Description: AFFiNE is CRDT-native from the ground up. Could be a better long-term solution than wrapping Obsidian.
Potential:
- No VNC needed (native web)
- Built-in collaboration
- Modern architecture
Challenges:
- Not Obsidian (different UX, different plugins)
- Less mature than Obsidian
- Users already invested in Obsidian
Decision: Park for now, evaluate after POC. Obsidian has massive plugin ecosystem.
[IDEA-005] Obsidian Mobile Plugin
Section titled “[IDEA-005] Obsidian Mobile Plugin”Date: 2024-12-19 Status: Captured
Description: Extend the CRDT sync plugin to work on Obsidian Mobile.
Potential:
- Full sync across desktop, mobile, and web
- Unified experience
Challenges:
- Mobile plugin API limitations
- Background sync on mobile is tricky
- Battery/performance concerns
[IDEA-006] Conflict Resolution UI
Section titled “[IDEA-006] Conflict Resolution UI”Date: 2024-12-18 Status: Captured
Description: When CRDT merges happen, provide a UI to show what was merged and allow manual adjustments.
Potential:
- Transparency about what changed
- Manual override when needed
- Educational about CRDT
Challenges:
- CRDT merges are usually invisible (that’s the point)
- UI complexity
- When to show vs auto-accept
[IDEA-007] Vault Templates for Enterprise
Section titled “[IDEA-007] Vault Templates for Enterprise”Date: 2024-12-19 Status: Captured
Description: Pre-configured vault templates with structure, plugins, and settings for enterprise use cases.
Potential:
- Faster onboarding
- Consistent setup across teams
- Best practices built-in
Challenges:
- One size doesn’t fit all
- Plugin compatibility
- Update management
[IDEA-008] CRDT Operation History for Audit
Section titled “[IDEA-008] CRDT Operation History for Audit”Date: 2024-12-19 Status: Captured
Description: Instead of just storing merged state, store the operation log to see who changed what when.
Potential:
- Full audit trail
- “Blame” functionality
- Undo individual user’s changes
Challenges:
- Storage grows unbounded
- Needs compaction strategy
- Privacy considerations
Parked Ideas
Section titled “Parked Ideas”[IDEA-P01] Browser Extension for Quick Capture
Section titled “[IDEA-P01] Browser Extension for Quick Capture”Description: Browser extension that clips content directly to Obsidian vault via CRDT sync.
Why Parked: Focus on core sync first. Can add later.
[IDEA-P02] AI Integration
Section titled “[IDEA-P02] AI Integration”Description: AI-powered features like summarization, tagging, linking suggestions.
Why Parked: Out of scope for POC. Obsidian has AI plugins already.
Rejected Ideas
Section titled “Rejected Ideas”[IDEA-R01] File-Level RBAC
Section titled “[IDEA-R01] File-Level RBAC”Description: Control access at the file level, not vault level.
Why Rejected: Fights Obsidian’s architecture. Would need to hide files in UI, check permissions on every operation. Vault-level is simpler and sufficient.
[IDEA-R02] Native Web Obsidian Port
Section titled “[IDEA-R02] Native Web Obsidian Port”Description: Port Obsidian to run natively in browser.
Why Rejected: Obsidian depends on Node.js filesystem APIs. Would need to rewrite core. VNC approach preserves full plugin compatibility.